Feb. 27, 2023
NEWS
TOP
ENERGY TRANSITION & POLICY
ELECTRICITY MARKETS
OIL, GAS & MINING
ANALYSIS
JAPAN’S MAKERS OF THERMAL POWER PLANTS
TRY TO ADJUST TO THE ENERGY TRANSITION
Alongside a national pledge to cut emissions and use more green energy, there’s one more indicator that shows Japan’s reliance on fossil fuels is on the wane. At the end of last year, two major Japanese suppliers of equipment for coal and gas-fired plants announced plans to merge their thermal generation business. While both companies have “Mitsubishi” in their name this is by no means a happy marriage. The fact it’s going ahead anyway shows just how much the makers of thermal power equipment in Japan are adjusting to the new net-zero era.
COLUMN: ENERGY JOBS IN JAPAN
LETTING EMPLOYEES GO, DO’s AND DON’Ts
Regardless of effort and careful planning, it’s still possible to make the wrong hire. And, sometimes those who have the hard skills and track record simply don’t adjust into the speed, style or culture of your business. Letting people go in Japan is no easy feat with the Labour Law firmly on the side of the employee in almost all situations. We review the key points to keep in mind before and after things come to such a conclusion.
GLOBAL VIEW
A wrap of top energy news from around the world.
EVENTS SCHEDULE
A selection of events to keep an eye on in 2023.
PUBLISHER
K. K. Yuri Group
Editorial Team
Yuriy Humber (Editor-in-Chief)
John Varoli (Senior Editor, Americas)
Mayumi Watanabe (Japan)
Yoshihisa Ohno (Japan)
Wilfried Goossens (Events, global)
Kyoko Fukuda (Japan)
Filippo Pedretti (Japan)
Regular Contributors
Chisaki Watanabe (Japan)
Takehiro Masutomo (Japan)
Events
SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADVERTISING
Japan NRG offers individual, corporate and academic subscription plans. Basic details are our website or write to subscriptions@japan-nrg.com
For marketing, advertising, or collaboration opportunities, contact sales@japan-nrg.com For all other inquiries, write to info@japan-nrg.com
OFTEN USED ACRONYMS
METI |
The Ministry of Energy, |
mmbtu |
Million British Thermal Units | |
MOE |
Ministry of Environment |
mb/d |
Million barrels per day | |
ANRE |
Agency for Natural Resources and Energy |
mtoe |
Million Tons of Oil Equivalent | |
NEDO |
New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization |
kWh |
Kilowatt hours (electricity generation volume) | |
TEPCO |
Tokyo Electric Power Company |
FIT |
Feed-in Tariff | |
KEPCO |
Kansai Electric Power Company |
FIP |
Feed-in Premium | |
EPCO |
Electric Power Company |
SAF |
Sustainable Aviation Fuel | |
JCC |
Japan Crude Cocktail |
NPP |
Nuclear power plant | |
JKM |
Japan Korea Market, the Platt’s LNG benchmark |
JOGMEC |
Japan Organization for Metals and Energy Security | |
CCUS |
Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage | |||
OCCTO |
Organization for Cross-regional Coordination of Transmission Operators | |||
NRA |
Nuclear Regulation Authority | |||
GX |
Green Transformation |
Kishida asks METI minister to directly engage with power rate hike reviews
(Government statement, Feb. 24)
TAKEAWAY: PM Kishida knows that utility prices is a sensitive issue and faces local elections in April. No matter how much industry protests, he wants to show the government is being tough to protect the population. But the economics of power generation in an age of elevated fuel prices cannot be ignored for long. Even with the recent easing in global gas and coal prices, power utilities will hope that they get at least a partial approval of their sought price increases.
METI to set up working group to drive EVs’ integration into power network
(Japan NRG, Feb. 21)
TAKEAWAY: Potential network issues include a sudden surge in the EV charging demand affecting power transmission elsewhere, and a lack of consistent standards among electrical systems at homes, offices and power facilities, making power charging and discharging inefficient. The biggest challenge is that on the back of slow EV spread Japan has little data to make base assumptions.
Transition finance panel publishes briefing paper on financed emissions
(Government statement, Feb. 20)
ANRE to establish new divisions for ammonia, hydrogen and carbon resources in summer
(Japan NRG, Feb. 22)
NRA met to discuss new rules for NPPs operating more than 60 years
(Denki Shimbun, Feb. 22)
TAKEAWAY: If the new regulation adheres fundamentally to the current one, then the essence won’t change substantially. Therefore, it seems METI is trying to bolster the perception that nuclear safety is being increased by requiring inspection every 10 years, and yet, also easing concerns about NPPs being in service for more than 60 years.
JBIC, three banks to finance construction of power lines between Saudi Arabia, Egypt
(Government statement, Feb. 21)
Narita International Airport and Tokyo Gas to invest in airport decarbonization
(Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun, Feb. 21)
TEPCO PG launches Japan’s first SF6 gas-free GIS
(Denki Shimbun, Feb. 21)
Three major chemical companies join forces on carbon neutrality in Keiyo Rinkai Complex
(Company statement, Feb. 13)
TAKEAWAY: Each company has a decarbonization target. In December 2021, Sumitomo Chemical called for decarbonization by 2050. Maruzen Petrochemical follows its parent company, Cosmo Energy Group, to develop decarbonization tech, chemical recycling, and negative emission technologies. Mitsui Chemical also declared carbon neutrality by 2050.
Toshiba completes the last of four TF coils for ITER
(Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun, Feb. 23)
Kajima won its first JCM for the Senayan Square tender in Jakarta
Company Statement, Feb. 14)
Panasonic to sell pure hydrogen fuel cell generators in China from April
(Asia Nikkei, Feb 26)
DENSO to produce plant decarbonization equipment
(Nikkei, Feb. 22)
TEPCO pushes forward with safety checks at unit 7 of Kashiwazaki – Kariwa NPP
(Niigata Sogo Television, Feb. 22)
TAKEAWAY: Faced with rising energy costs and tight electricity supply, the restart of this NPP is a top priority for TEPCO, as well as the for government. The company is doing everything possible to ensure an early restart, and wants to demonstrate its readiness to move forward. The company says it expects to restart Unit 7 in October, but that has yet to be confirmed by regulators.
Mitsubishi Electric acquires Swedish DC circuit breaker developer Scibreak
(Company statement, Feb. 20)
TAKEAWAY: For many years, European companies, especially ABB and Siemens, had a technological advantage in HVDC tech over Japanese companies. This is why Hitachi purchased ABB in 2020. Dr. Tomas Modeer, the founder of Scibreak, worked at ABB before establishing his company in 2014.
TAKEAWAY: In 2015, Mitsubishi Electric developed the world’s most efficient large-scale thermal power generator. It can use 99% of energy for generation. The new thermal power generation company formed from MHI, Hitachi and Mitsubishi Electric assets, which is scheduled to be fully consolidated from April 2024, is expected to have a competitive position in international markets.
TAKEAWAY: Please see this week’s Analysis section for a detailed look at the history of the power equipment making sector in Japan.
Hokkaido Electric delays Ishikari LNG-fired units’ start and Tomari NPP inspections
(Nikkei, Feb. 24)
Pacifico Energy plans a 120 MW solar plant in Yamaguchi Pref.
(New Energy Business News, Feb. 21)
KEPCO announced a new offshore wind project in Hokkaido
(Company statement, Denki Shimbun, Feb. 22)
J-POWER’s Shimamaki Wind Farm begins commercial operation
(Company statement, Feb. 16)
Itochu and Shizen Energy to work on grid-scale storage batteries
(Company statement, Feb. 16)
Kansai Electric puts marketing on hold until compliance improves
(MBS News, Feb. 24)
TAKEAWAY: Over the past three years, more than 1,600 staff at Kansai Electric repeatedly gained unauthorized access to customer data of new power market players. Since this is the first time for Kansai Electric to voluntarily cease marketing, meeting compliance obligations has been strongly requested.
GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy’s SMR will be deployed in Estonia
(Denki Shimbun, Feb. 21)
TAKEAWAY: Prior to this order, GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy’s BWRX-300 SMR was deployed in the U.S. (TVA / Clinch River site); in Canada (OPG / Darlington site) and (SaskPower / Estevan and Elbow sites); and in Poland (ORLEN Synthos Green Energy / sites to be disclosed in April). Hitachi is currently the most active of the Japanese nuclear vendors on a global stage.
TEPCO to hire 850 people in 2024, the most since 2011 Tohoku earthquake
(Nikkei, Feb. 20)
TAKEAWAY Due to a reduction in employees, the transfer of technical know-how among staff is an issue. TEPCO is compensating for a shortage of young employees. It is also trying to thicken its workforce while facing issues such as high fuel costs and electricity prices.
Green Power Investment plans a 37 MW wind farm in Mie Pref
(Kankyo Business, Feb. 21)
TAKEAWAY: While the government has called for building more renewable energy capacity, concerns over environmental protection continue to be important. This dilemma might slow construction of new renewables projects as companies are more cautious on what they seek to develop.
TEPCO will use surplus renewable energy to produce chemicals
(Nikkei, Feb. 21)
Hitachi Energy launches next-gen TXpert solution to digitalize transformers
(Company statement, Feb. 22)
TAKEAWAY: Up to now, all transformer data such as voltage, current, frequency or impedance have been measured by analogue equipment. Hitachi’s new technology can be applied to any kind of transformer and should drastically improve the reliability of power systems.
Nippon Steel takes 10% of Canadian coal miner EVR
(Company statement, Feb. 22)
TAKEAWAY: High-coking coal prices and the need to replace Russian coal are driving steelmakers to secure new supplies. Nippon Steel spent over ¥100 billion in the last five years for facility upgrades to cut carbon. These costs will eventually be figured into the prices of steel used for vehicles and wind power equipment.
Sumitomo Corp signs sales agreement with U.S. MP Materials for rare earths
(Japan NRG, Feb. 21)
TAKEAWAY: Sumitomo will also help MP Materials identify outsourcing partners in Thailand, Malaysia and Vietnam to build a global rare earth supply chain from ore extraction to magnet production. As the Mountain Pass output is very large, intermediate processing needs to be split among multiple plants in diverse locations.
LNG stocks rise to 2.63 million tons
(Government data, Feb. 24)
BY YOSHIHISA OHNO
Japan’s Makers of Thermal Power Equipment
Seek to Confront and Adjust to the Energy Transition
Alongside a national pledge to cut emissions and use more green energy, there’s one more indicator that shows Japan’s reliance on fossil fuels is on the wane.
At the end of last year, two major Japanese suppliers of equipment for coal and gas-fired plants announced plans to merge their thermal generation business. While both companies have “Mitsubishi” in their name, referring to their roots as once being part of Japan’s biggest industrial zaibatsu grouping, this is by no means a happy marriage, especially for the employees.
The fact that Mitsubishi Electric and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) still went ahead and announced plans to integrate their thermal power business is significant. In a historical sense, it brings the multiple restructurings of the Mitsubishi electrical equipment empire back full circle – almost 100 years on from its first asset split. It also marks a turning point for Japan’s power equipment industry, reflecting the global trend of moving away from the burning of fossil fuels for electricity.
In the late 20th century, Japan had enough big players producing equipment for oil, coal and gas-fired power plants to field a sports team. The transition to cleaner energy has put tremendous pressure on the sector, which is now rapidly, if reluctantly, consolidating to survive. But will the merged entities find a place in the energy transition’s brave new world?
Background
In late December 2022, Mitsubishi Electric and MHI said they’ll form a JV to integrate their respective thermal power technologies and assets. Mitsubishi Electric is expected to be the majority shareholder of the new company, the name of which is still not known, and the merger is expected to be completed by April 2024.
The companies seek to improve competitiveness in a world focused on carbon-neutrality by pooling resources, which would help them offer cleaner thermal power products; for example, by helping to convert thermal plants to burn hydrogen and ammonia.
Mitsubishi Electric was created in 1921 when the electrical equipment business of MHI (then known as Mitsubishi Zosen) was spun off. Post-war Japan saw the power industry dominated by four major companies and several second-tier suppliers. As the economy grew rapidly after the war, demand for power also increased, continuing to the very end of the 20th century.
Many companies supplied equipment to produce electricity and also transport it (known as Transmission & Distribution, or T&D). First, there were the big players, including Toshiba, Hitachi, MHI and Mitsubishi Electric, that supplied equipment for large power plants and substations. Then, there was a group of smaller players that were also specialists in certain areas. This group included Meidensha, Nisshin Electric, Takaoka Electric and Fuji Electric.
Source: Japan NRG
However, the domestic market started to shrink as it became saturated and Japan’s population started to decline. Today, the volume of orders inside Japan can’t support this many firms, while competition for projects abroad has grown fierce. In the past two decades, highly competitive players in this sector have emerged in other countries in Asia and elsewhere, causing the global market share held by Japanese companies to decline.
After a big bang-like explosion a century ago, Japan’s power equipment space is shrinking.
The collapse
In July 2001, Hitachi, Fuji Electric and Meidensha merged their power T&D businesses to form Nihon AE Power Systems, with the following share structure: Hitachi 50%, Fuji 30%, and Meidensha 20%. This merger was an attempt to manage decreasing domestic demand. A decade later, however, even this entity was dissolved.
In April 2002, just one year after the creation of Nihon AE Power, Toshiba and Mitsubishi Electric also merged their assets in the same space to form TM T&D, an equal partnership. That company, however, had an even shorter life, folding in March 2005.
Why were those power T&D mergers unsuccessful? In part, it was likely due to an overt focus on the domestic market, which at the time still looked healthy if subdued. Also, the combinations did little to bolster Japanese competitiveness overseas.
In the case of TM T&D, for example, the product lineup of the two parent companies had a lot of overlap: both made transformers, switchgears, distribution equipment and power systems. In such cases, engineers and sales teams from each side try to protect their own tech and get embroiled in internal struggles. At the same time, what the merger failed to do was offer a new leap in technology or improved business efficiency.
Source: Japan NRG
Hitachi began to suspect that it needed to look for inspiration elsewhere and broke away from Fuji and Meidensha.
Meanwhile, Japanese equipment makers looked to make gains through restructuring in the power generation side of the business.
In October 2011, the hydro assets of Mitsubishi Electric, MHI and Hitachi merged to form Hitachi Mitsubishi Hydro Corporation. (Hitachi with a 50% stake, Mitsubishi Electric 30%, and MHI 20%). Hitachi supplies both water turbines and generators, MHI supplies only water turbines and Mitsubishi Electric supplies generators.
Source: Japan NRG
Most suitable sites in Japan for large hydro power stations were already developed, but this segment continued to bring in decent revenue from maintenance work. It was a neat solution for a small segment, but all parties knew that the overall impact would be small. So, industry players turned to big-ticket overseas M&A as their next solution.
This precipitated the nadir for power equipment makers in Japan.
Nuclear fallout from investment
When nuclear energy came back in vogue around the mid-2000s thanks to a rethink over new plant construction in the U.S. and elsewhere, as well as the emergence of China as a major new investor in atomic stations, Toshiba decided to make a big bet on the sector. After all, a nuclear power plant also contains a lot of equipment that’s utilized in a thermal power plant. It seemed a logical next step.
Toshiba was already a major supplier of BWR reactors, one of the two dominant technologies globally. But China and other new entrants to the nuclear arena seemed more inclined to base their nuclear programs around PWR, the other mainstream tech. And so, in 2006 Toshiba struck a $5.4 billion deal to buy Westinghouse.
Westinghouse, then owned by British Nuclear Fuels, had struggled for decades but was on an upward trajectory having become one of the new foreign firms allowed to win orders to build reactors in China. The prospect of entry to such a potentially large market, and holding the keys to both PWR and BWR technologies, pushed Toshiba to outbid GE and MHI and pay triple what Westinghouse was initially expected to cost.
Unfortunately for Toshiba, the deal spectacularly unraveled. The flood of Chinese reactor orders never materialized as Beijing simply took over Westinghouse IP. Construction projects in the U.S. stalled. Culture clashes between Toshiba and Westinghouse foiled progress. Then came the news of accounting irregularities that turned into billions of dollars in losses for Toshiba. Westinghouse finally filed for bankruptcy in March 2017.
On a less grand scale, MHI saw its own nuclear ambitions sour. The company secured an order for four reactors in Turkey and planned to partner with France’s Areva in the project. Construction costs doubled, however, and MHI and Areva both pulled out in 2018. Since then, MHI has not secured any major nuclear orders for their traditional PWR reactors.
The less “glamorous” path
At first, Hitachi fared just as poorly as its domestic industry peers. A post-Lehman global slowdown hit the engineering group hard. In 2009, it posted a ¥787 billion loss, the biggest by a Japanese manufacturer and the second biggest by a Japanese company.
This led to hard choices. In nuclear, Hitachi decided to pool its business with GE, becoming very much the junior partner in the global market (while retaining a stronger presence in the domestic nuclear sector).
More significantly, Hitachi decided to refocus resources from generation to T&D, but this time through international alliances. After years of searching for the right fit, Hitachi made a record acquisition for a Swiss firm that makes high voltage DC (HVDC) transmission infrastructure, transformers, and control systems. In 2018, Hitachi agreed to pay $6.85 billion for about 80% of engineering conglomerate ABB’s power grid business. In 2022, Hitachi exercised a $1.68 billion call option to buy out ABB’s 19.9% stake in the joint venture, claiming full ownership of the entity, which has since been renamed Hitachi Energy.
In the last five years, profit attributable to Hitachi’s shareholders is up 60%.
Source: Japan NRG
Reinventing themselves
Today, Japan’s power equipment makers are looking to reinvent themselves for the net-zero era. Rounds of restructuring, resource consolidation and M&A have made the companies more focused, although the ongoing troubles at Toshiba indicate that this process is likely not over.
So, where are these companies heading? MHI has clearly aligned itself with the latest nuclear renaissance and is the most likely vendor to build new reactors in Japan over the coming two decades. After all, it has performed the lion’s share of maintenance work on existing units nationwide in the last decade.
Meanwhile, MHI has poured more resources into development of hydrogen-fired generation, promising commercial-scale turbines and other equipment ready to run on ammonia or hydrogen fuel by 2025. It is also involved in several CCS test projects in Japan and has orders for the technology from power plants around the world. Perhaps even more telling is the fact that MHI has spun off its conventional thermal power business.
Hitachi poured its thermal power assets into a JV with MHI and then sold out; today, it is more of a software-led engineering firm with interest in T&D, energy systems, optimization, renewables and EV integration and carbon solutions. Hitachi is also developing ammonia co-firing technologies.
The merger of assets by Mitsubishi Electric and MHI shrinks the product and service options in pure thermal power even further. The two say they are interested in transforming thermal plants to burn carbon-neutral fuels including hydrogen and ammonia. That makes sense since Japan plans to decommission almost 27 GW of oil, gas and coal-fired capacity this decade. While some new thermal stations will be added, the net capacity loss should be around 17 GW, based on METI data.
In recent history, Japanese manufacturers have struggled to put aside former rivalries and learn to survive together. Almost no one buys a Japanese branded smartphone anymore. The makers of power equipment have taken hard decisions, scrapped once untouchable assets and boldly selected new paths. Now they need their people to do the same.
BY ANDREW STATTER
Column: Hiring the Wrong Person – Letting Employees Go in Japan
Regardless of the stringency of the interview process, the effectiveness of aptitude tests and the quality of references from a candidate, it’s still possible to make the wrong hire. There’s only so much that can be discerned through the interview, and sometimes those who have the hard skills and track record simply don’t adjust into the speed, style or culture of your business.
To make matters more complicated, Japan’s energy workforce is now facing a major transition. This was traditionally a sector run by large corporations and utilities. But over the last decade it has fragmented into a number of smaller domestic and international players. Many highly-qualified professionals have spent their entire career in one company, which makes gathering reference checks troublesome and poses challenges for people to adjust to a new corporate culture and way of working mid-career.
What’s more, letting people go in Japan is no easy feat. So here are the key points to keep in mind before and after things come to such a conclusion.
Letting go of an employee in Japan
Japanese labor law is highly protective of employees, making it more difficult to fire them in comparison to the U.S. and other markets. All employment contracts are superseded by Japanese Labour Law, which can effectively mute clauses in the contract. A key example of this is probation periods. Typically, we see a three- or six-month probation period in a full-time contract; however, under law, once an employee has been employed for a period of two weeks, they are protected by labor law, and the contract cannot be instantly terminated as is often stipulated.
In order to let an employee go over poor performance or discipline violations, the matter must be clearly proven. While cases of severe misconduct can warrant instant dismissal, when it comes to minor infractions or underperformance, employers must move slowly and carefully. This includes meetings, warnings, and support from the company to help the employee improve over a period of months.
In both cases, the employer is required to give 30 days’ notice and pay the employee during that time. Like many things in Japan, details on how long, and what level of warnings must be given are vague. For a more comprehensive overview, we suggest speaking to a labor lawyer before taking decisive action, since the majority of unfair dismissal lawsuits go the way of the employee.
A negotiated voluntary resignation is the most common and effective method to release an employee in Japan. In this case, the employer will need to privately speak with the employee, explain the reasons for which they wish to end the employment, and compensate the employee for their voluntary resignation. This will come with costs: months of salary, accrued bonuses, buyout of annual leave, and etc.
Contract labor force
For construction and engineering, Japan has a relatively mature contract labor market that can readily move around the country for work on project sites. However, the contract employment market for highly skilled workers in finance, law, project management, and etc., is very narrow. This is in large part due to a cultural adversity to perceived risk and instability. In addition to cultural or social pressure, it can be more difficult for contract employees to get access to financing for home loans, approvals for rental properties, entrance for children to schools of choice, and etc.
There’s some opportunity to hire talent in more white collar, headquarter functions. However, this tends to be for either top level professionals who come with a high price tag, or well-connected experts who are close to or beyond standard retirement age.
Severance payments
Again, Japanese labor law tends to be quite vague when it comes to how much should be paid to workers during layoffs in cases of downsizing, market exit or strategic shifts in the business.
While we’ve seen cases of companies paying out severance as low as the legally required 30 days, this is on the low side and tends to anger and disappoint employees. Though a company is unlikely to face legal action for this, be careful, because the industry is small. People talk to each other. So, in order to protect your brand and corporate reputation, we advise against paying such a low amount, especially if you plan to remain in Japan’s market.
On average, the market standard is a package of between three to six months, depending on the employee’s position, length of service and contribution. Also, just like with letting an employee go over poor performance, resolving this matter via a negotiated voluntary resignation is the most painless option.
If the employer is downsizing for economic reasons, a key point to bear in mind is that you’ll need to prove that other cost reduction measures have already been implemented. These may be reducing working hours, cutting executive pay, business trips, and etc.
Risk mitigation strategy
As mentioned earlier, probation periods are rendered mute as labor laws protect employees two weeks after starting. An option available to employers is to offer a three- or six-month fixed contract, with the option to move to full-time employment upon successful performance during the contract period. In this case, there’s no obligation to renew, or offer full-time employment, effectively giving an option to cease employment after expiry of the initial contract.
Point to bear in mind, though: Japanese are typically risk-averse, and this strategy is still not widely used, meaning that if a company is making an offer to a candidate with multiple offers, this may reduce the chances of a successful close. Also, we advise to clearly state, in written form at the time of offering the initial contract, the full-time employment conditions, including salary, bonuses, annual leave, benefits, etc.
Case study A:
Private equity backed infrastructure developer | All positions
One of our early clients has been employing this strategy with all hires. Initially, people are employed on a six-month contract, with full insurance and medical benefits. The offer letter clearly states the conditions for full-time employment so that the employee knows what to expect. This company is not concerned about the risk of losing some candidates who are not keen on an initial contract without guarantee of full-time employment. Their position is that they’re fostering a performance-based, results-focused culture, and a lean, high-performing team. Therefore, they wish to attract only those with confidence in their ability to deliver.
Case study B:
Private equity solar and storage project developer | Country Manager & Head of Development
Some years ago, we supported a new firm to enter the Japanese renewable energy market when it needed to hire an initial senior leadership team. The company wished to hire professionals who were well connected and could add value very quickly. The hires were initially given a three-month contract with a reasonable monthly salary and performance targets to hit before being considered for full-time employment.
This narrowed the candidate pool, as only those who could deliver quickly and had a high-risk appetite, were eligible. An interesting twist was the power placed in the candidate’s hands. By performing well and bringing projects forward to acquire and develop within that three-month period, candidates were able to make a case for themselves and greatly increase their bargaining power for package negotiations when it came time to raise the issue of full-time employment.
We see this strategy most often implemented with project developers and private equity investors. This can be an excellent risk mitigation tool for professionals who are in highly ‘pay for performance’ positions, such as development and acquisition. However, in more stable functions it can be harder to attract talent.
Ultimately, Japan is a market that best rewards a long-term view. The same is true in the hiring and firing part of it. However, starting a new office or building from a small team gives you the ability to set the tone and mold a culture in line with your business targets.
BY JOHN VAROLI AND FILIPPO PEDRETTI
Below are some of last week’s most important international energy developments monitored by the Japan NRG team because of their potential to impact energy supply and demand, as well as prices. We see the following as relevant to Japanese and international energy investors.
Australia/ Energy transition
Resolving congestion on the main electricity grid was top of the agenda at the first meeting of federal, state and territory energy ministers in 2023. The gathering approved changes to reduce lost electricity and lower the risks for clean energy investors. The government also plans to push for a separate national green hydrogen strategy.
China/ Commodities trading
A subsidiary of CNIC Corp bought an approximate 5% stake, worth about $220 million, in Swiss-based global energy trader Mercuria. China seeks to hedge its global interests against possible Western sanctions due to its support for Russia in its conflict with NATO.
EU/Gas supplies
While Europe had a mild winter with gas storage close to record levels, it faces another costly race to replenish reserves. While prices have eased to around €50/ MWh from last August’s peak of more than €340, they still remain above historic averages.
France/ Climate lawsuit
Three climate activist groups took legal action in a Paris court against BNP Paribas, alleging that the bank’s loans to big oil and gas companies breach laws that protect the environment.
Indonesia/ Carbon trading
Indonesia launched the first phase of mandatory carbon trading for coal power plants. The first stage of a carbon trading mechanism will cover 99 power plants with a total installed capacity of 33.6 GW. Coal makes up more than half of Indonesia’s power generation.
Methane emissions
The fossil fuel industry is failing to tackle methane emissions despite pledges to fix leaking infrastructure, said the International Energy Agency (IEA). In 2022, the global energy industry released into the atmosphere some 135 million tons of methane.
Sri Lanka/ Wind power
The Board of Investment approved two wind power plants by India’s Adani Green Energy with a total investment of $442 million. The two wind farms will have a total capacity of 350 MW and will be operational by 2025.
Vietnam/ Wind power
EU manufacturers might make major investments to build wind turbine plants. The Southeast Asian country is seen as a potential major player because it has strong winds in shallow waters near densely populated coastal areas, reported the World Bank.
UK/ Energy subsidies
The UK government announced measures to help more than 300 energy-intensive companies which are dealing with high power costs. The targeted manufacturing sectors include steel, metal, paper, and chemicals.
Pakistan/ Coal power
Pakistan intends to quadruple its coal-fired power from 2.31 GW to 10 GW after deciding not to build new gas-fired plants. The country experienced severe blackouts after not being able to procure required volumes of gas or LNG last year. Pakistan needs to cut electricity costs and is facing a severe foreign exchange crisis.
EU/ Carbon market
Europe’s carbon price hit an all time high of €100 ($106.59) as its economy starts to recover. Demand for carbon contracts is increasing as many anticipate that industrial companies will restart production. At the same time, the prospect of tighter climate regulations means that pollution rights may be less available in the future.
A selection of domestic and international events we believe will have an impact on Japanese energy
Disclaimer
This communication has been prepared for information purposes only, is confidential and may be legally privileged. This is a subscription-only service and is directed at those who have expressly asked K.K. Yuri Group or one of its representatives to be added to the mailing list. This document may not be onwardly circulated or reproduced without prior written consent from Yuri Group, which retains all copyright to the content of this report.
Yuri Group is not registered as an investment advisor in any jurisdiction. Our research and all the content express our opinions, which are generally based on available public information, field studies and own analysis. Content is limited to general comment upon general political, economic and market issues, asset classes and types of investments. The report and all of its content does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, subscribe for or underwrite any product or physical commodity, or a financial instrument.
The information contained in this report is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. No representation or warranty is made that it is accurate or complete. Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice, as are prices and availability, which are indicative only. There is no obligation to notify recipients of any changes to this data or to do so in the future. No responsibility is accepted for the use of or reliance on the information provided. In no circumstances will Yuri Group be liable for any indirect or direct loss, or consequential loss or damages arising from the use of, any inability to use, or any inaccuracy in the information.
K.K. Yuri Group: Oonoya Building 8F, Yotsuya 1-18, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 160-0004.
NEWS
・PM Kishida steps in to demand tough review of utility price hike applications, signaling hard stance of big increases in power bills
・TEPCO starts safety checks at operational nuclear power plant, positioning itself as ready to restart Kashiwazaki Kariwa NPP
・Nippon Steel buys 10% of Canadian coal miner for ¥110 bln; says it can supply coal suitable for hydrogen-reduction ironmaking